The 2026 World Cup Was a Spectacle — But Don't Let the Football Wash Away the Mess

Last updated:
Content navigation

Spain won the World Cup. Six billion people allegedly watched. Gianni Infantino declared he needed to "invent new vocabulary" to describe the success. And somewhere in all that noise, Donald Trump admitted he called FIFA's president to get an American player's suspension overturned.

That's the World Cup in 2026 — extraordinary football wrapped in a layer of politics that no amount of Haaland memes can fully dissolve.

What the tournament actually delivered

For six weeks across the USA, Canada, and Mexico, the expanded 48-team format broadly worked. No catastrophic logistical failures. Some genuine all-time classics. New heroes, underdog stories, and a global audience that stretched well beyond traditional football markets.

Cabo Verde's 40-year-old goalkeeper Vozinha became an unlikely global icon. Curaçao — the smallest nation ever to qualify — scored their first World Cup goal. The Dutch Oranje walk took over Texas. Mexicans outnumbered every other fanbase in essentially every North American city. And Palestinians in Gaza, sitting on rubble, watched Egypt play Argentina in the round of 16 and supported anyway.

That last image matters. NYU's Dr Lindsay Sarah Krasnoff, who studies sports diplomacy, put it well: sport doesn't create world peace overnight, but it builds understanding on a citizen-to-citizen level that accumulates over time. Iraq's presence at this tournament reframed a country for Western audiences who'd spent 30 years hearing its name only in the context of war. That's not nothing.

The football itself — Messi, Mbappé, Haaland, Kane, a relentless Spanish side — delivered the spectacle FIFA promised. The atmospheres were sometimes closer to a Super Bowl corporate day out than a proper football crowd, ticket prices having filtered out many genuine supporters in favour of deep-pocketed neutrals. But the product on the pitch covered a lot of sins.

The questions that don't disappear with the final whistle

Trump's intervention — a sitting US president publicly admitting he called Infantino to wipe out Falorin Balogun's suspension — is a problem FIFA cannot paper over with record viewing figures. The organisation insists its independent disciplinary committee handled the process correctly. The probe is ongoing. The optics are what they are.

The heat scheduling was another avoidable embarrassment. Marquee games kicking off in 40-degree afternoon heat in Miami and Philadelphia to serve European broadcast windows, while mandatory hydration breaks looked farcical in climate-controlled stadiums in Atlanta and Dallas. These weren't minor inconveniences — they were decisions that prioritised TV money over player welfare in plain sight.

On the legacy question — particularly in the US and Canada — the answers are complicated. MLS wants to become one of the world's top five leagues off the back of this momentum, which is an ambition that needs considerably more than goodwill and one Messi partnership to back it up. Canada's run to the round of 16 genuinely moved the needle domestically. Whether that translates to sustained engagement, Dr Nicole Forrester from Toronto Metropolitan University thinks tracking male athlete performance in future tournaments will be the real measure.

Mexico's co-hosting legacy gets tangled up in the cost of staging it against a backdrop of serious ongoing social challenges — a calculation that doesn't resolve cleanly.

The football did the talking, as it usually does. But as the tournament played out, ICE agents shot and killed two more people in separate incidents in Maine and Houston. The World Cup was happening in that America too.

"I think this was perhaps a rapid-fire immersion in the world of FIFA and how FIFA is its own entity," Dr Krasnoff said. "Sometimes things are not necessarily always as logical as one would think."

That's a diplomatic way of saying: enjoy the football, but keep watching everything else.

Steve Ward.
Author
Last updated: July 2026